FREE ENERGY GENERATOR BY KAPANADZE 100 KW – PART -1

Sat, May 15, 2010

Free Energy Magnetic Motor Videos

Free Energy Plans - Magnet4Power

FREE ENERGY GENERATOR BY KAPANADZE 100 KW – PART -1 THIS TEST THIRD PARTY 100 KW GENERATOR LOW LOAD TEST . ANOTHER TEST FULL POWER AND 100 KW / ENERGY QUALITY TESTED BY FLUKE POWER ANALIZER.

, , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “FREE ENERGY GENERATOR BY KAPANADZE 100 KW – PART -1”

  1. KokomoJ0 Says:
    29. July 2009 at 12:21 am

    yup I will believe it when I can buy it at walmart

  2. taner311 Says:
    29. July 2009 at 6:56 pm

    congratulations! I ca not wait to see part-2
    (Can capacitive coupling of two tesla transformers be effective like this?)

  3. Relayer1974 Says:
    14. August 2009 at 3:04 pm

    The last time I checked, arcing was a bad thing in any electrical apparatus with the exception of some kind of toy or weapon (Jacob’s ladder or stun gun). All conspiracy theories aside, good luck getting the NEC changed to allow arcing as an integral part of a generator.

  4. mike4ty4 Says:
    30. August 2009 at 8:31 am

    Videos prove absolutely nothing. Because ANYTHING and EVERYTHING in them can be faked. Anything there could be rigged — the sparkers, the dials, you name it. The whole thing could be staged and nobody here could tell. Movies are made all the time that look like they could be real but of course we know they aren’t. So videos do not prove anything at all, really.

  5. Nabo00o Says:
    30. August 2009 at 8:47 pm

    Conclusion; you don’t know what’s going on here, but some of us do. This is *big*

  6. mike4ty4 Says:
    31. August 2009 at 5:18 pm

    A big what? You said, “This is a *big*”.

    No, I don’t know what’s going on here, as I cannot go to the place to investigate. But I do know that this video is not evidence of any significant weight of free energy. Does that mean that there was no free energy here? No, it doesn’t. It means this video does not support the claim that there was. OK?

  7. mike4ty4 Says:
    31. August 2009 at 6:17 pm

    I read it again, you said “this is big” not “A” big… sorry… oops…

  8. Nabo00o Says:
    31. August 2009 at 8:59 pm

    Hey sorry I didn’t mean to be a smartypants, it’s just that there always seems to be a huge gap between those who have some knowledge of these inventions and those who don’t, and after some time that makes me frustrated. Its hard trying to share ideas when we have to start at the beginning for every time.

    First of you’re right, video is never a good evidence on its own.
    If I’m not completely of track here the spark seems to be the essential ingredient. Potential fields accelerates the charges.

  9. mike4ty4 Says:
    1. September 2009 at 3:15 pm

    Where do you manage to get this knowledge from? If it’s extremely complex then of course you’d have to “start from the beginning”, no? I mean, if you have a machine you invent, and you’re the only one who knows about it, then to tell someone else about it you have to start from the beginning, no?

  10. mike4ty4 Says:
    1. September 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Note the “you” in the last bit is more generic than _you_ specifically. It also applies if you didn’t invent the machine, too, but still had special “knowledge” of it.

  11. mike4ty4 Says:
    1. September 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Hmm. You say “potential fields accelerate the charges”. So does a particle accelerator. So wouldn’t the “effect” show up in experiments done with a particle accelerator? And there’s been oodles of those done….

  12. gilbondfac Says:
    9. September 2009 at 2:00 pm

    tesla coil !!! that’s all ??? where is the free energy ???

  13. grom780 Says:
    25. October 2009 at 9:56 am

    Капанадзе молодец !!! Нарисуй схему пусть все пользуются. По больше бы таких людей.

  14. MrFreeenergy Says:
    5. November 2009 at 8:36 pm

    or may not get you there. You can be real and fake mr mike . really. we are a not company at holywood and we not theater . Where the idea of this tool soon everyone using . your these ideas insert your Where ? hehh heee…….. see again

  15. MrFreeenergy Says:
    5. November 2009 at 8:38 pm

    o k ?????????

  16. mike4ty4 Says:
    6. November 2009 at 7:16 pm

    I didn’t make any proposal or theory for a device, so I’m not sure what you mean by “me” being “real” or “fake”. All I’m pointing out is that these videos do not prove or provide useful evidence for anything, because it is easy to fake them, and they cannot be easily tested to determine their veracity. It is also not possible to really see if the machine is actually providing results or deluding the “inventor” (this is often the case more than deliberate hoaxes).

  17. mike4ty4 Says:
    6. November 2009 at 7:20 pm

    The real test for a free energy machine is to hook the out to the in and see if it powers itself, and if one doesn’t want to do that, if the Watts (W) going in from conventional sources of energy are smaller than the Watts (W) going out. And if hooking out to in, put a load on there too, and see if it can generate enough to power the load and itself at the same time.

  18. mike4ty4 Says:
    6. November 2009 at 7:24 pm

    The point is just that there isn’t any way to really _prove_ these claims over the interwebs. The only proof, I could see, would be to physically go there and examine the device.

    Failing that, provide a small-scale working model. If it produces even only a few watts, that’s still free energy.

    Failing THAT, provide EXACT plans for reproducing this machine or a small model, that is, leaving no detail omitted.

  19. vreditel158 Says:
    7. December 2009 at 7:55 pm

    And when your site earns tmzenerji????

  20. RomH4ck Says:
    19. December 2009 at 4:01 am

    Ptent # WO2008103129A1, google it! stop your BS comments!

  21. voyeurweb Says:
    19. December 2009 at 10:12 pm

    I can understand, that there could be transfer of energy from one couil to another by magnetic field caused by alternating current flowing through it. But where does the additional energy come from? What kind of additional energy is taken “from the air” and transformed to electrical? Is it heat of that surrounding air or does it come from space? If the second, using such energy for usual applications, like lights, motors or boilers will only result in another source of atmosphere warming.

  22. MrAnguswangus Says:
    3. January 2010 at 4:05 am

    I’ve read the patent and my thought is that a high frequency AC current (easy to produce) is being put through a caduceus coil which would produce a lot of scalar magnetic waves. These waves are not measurable with conventional instruments. I will be trying this soon…I just have to wind some pick-up coils to get an AC current from my Bedini setup. If something interesting happens I will definately be making a video. The trick is the caduceus coil…2 intertwined snakes with the tails connected

  23. UBERKron Says:
    29. March 2010 at 12:01 am

    im glad it has a jacobs ladder. otherwise i might think its fake…………….

  24. ThoughtTravel Says:
    14. May 2010 at 3:25 am

    @mike4ty4 No, it isn’t electrodynamic phenomena violating the law of energy conservation , it’s real energy being utilized from a source like wind, solar, or tidal … The Earth is a huge magnetic oscillator .. why don’t we just oscillate our motors using her favorite frequency instead of being bullish about out 50 and 60 Hz? But he’s converting it to 50HZ here anyway. Say it: “Kapanadze Now! ” It’s free. It’s “tapping in.” to what’s there. Let’s get this done!

  25. selfonlypath Says:
    15. May 2010 at 5:03 am

    @mike4ty4: indeed hooking output with input while providing energy to a load aka closed loop is indeed the only CORRECT test. But you need advanced control laws & make sure enough load is connected otherwise you will get a diverging ZPE oscillator creating VERY dangerous phenomaes. In the worst case: psykinesis & health effect since ZPE opens a black hole in order to tap vacuum energy. In the best case: destruction of the ZPE reactor.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress Lab